The Federal Circuit is writing more opinions — specifically, more nonprecedential opinions — several years after it faced criticism from a group of patent lawyers and academics over the frequency with which it disposed of cases using judgments saying just “affirmed,” Michael Shapiro reports. In 2025, the Federal Circuit issued 94 judgments under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 36, which allows such decisions. According to a Bloomberg Law analysis, it was the first time that number dipped below 100 since 2007, and the court is on pace to post a modestly smaller total in 2026. The court continues to have the same power to issue the judgments, but such issuances have slowed to a trickle. At the same time, the number of nonprecedential opinions it issues is steadily increasing. The change follows a string of unsuccessful Supreme Court petitions from patent owners, including Island Intellectual Property, who argued the one-word rulings made it impossible to understand why their cases were rejected by the appeals court, which has exclusive jurisdiction over patent appeals. While SCOTUS declined to act, the Federal Circuit appears to have taken note. Charley Macedo, one of the lawyers who represented Island IP, was cautiously optimistic his team’s push had moved the needle on the one-word judgments. “I’d be happy if our objections resonated with the court,” he said.
|
|
|
Suno Inc. violated “countless” singers’ and musicians’ publicity rights through its name-indexed AI that creates music embodying their distinctive traits on demand, a proposed class action suit says. Read More
|
|
|
Apple Inc. failed to convince a federal judge in Georgia to dismiss allegations that it misappropriated Fintiv Inc. trade secrets and violated RICO when building its Apple Pay mobile wallet available on millions of consumer devices. Read More
|
|
|
Medical technology trade groups Tuesday failed to revive their challenge to the Library of Congress’ decision to exempt medical device repair from an anti-hacking copyright law. Read More
|
|
|
A Hanover Insurance Group Inc. unit had no duty to defend a medical practice against a third-party trademark infringement lawsuit, a state appellate court said. Read More
|
|
|
Fox Corp. and its sports production unit have been accused by an Atlanta-based technology company of using advanced networking and storage systems to create and distribute live and recorded media that infringe three patents. Read More
|
|
|
A former software engineer at Google LLC who was convicted of stealing the tech giant’s trade secrets for building AI chips was sentenced to a one year prison term by a California federal court Tuesday. Read More
|
|
|
|
|
A&O Shearman has hired former Western District of Texas Judge Alan D. Albright, who announced his plans to depart the bench earlier in the year. Read More
|
Andres Liivak joined Morgan Lewis as a partner in its corporate and business transactions practice in Boston, the firm announced Tuesday. Read More
|
US law firms racing to expand in London are hitting a speed bump: local rivals that force lawyers to sit on the sidelines for long stretches before they can jump to new jobs. Read More
|
|
|
The court affirmed the decision of the PTAB that some challenged claims of SpaceTime3D Inc.'s patent for a graphical user interface that displays webpages as objects in a 3D space are unpatentable, in inter partes reviews by Apple Inc. and Google LLC. Apple Inc. v. SpaceTime3D Inc., 2026 BL 337662, Fed. Cir., 2025-1022, 2025-1051, 2025-1082, 8/31/26 Read More
|
|
|
The court affirmed decisions of a federal district court in Evolved Wireless LLC’s action against Samsung Electronics America Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. for infringement of a patent that relates to “handover” of a terminal. Evolved Wireless LLC v. Samsung Electronics America Inc. , 2026 BL 337653, Fed. Cir., 2024-2234, 2024-2280, nonprecedential, 8/31/26 Read More
|
|
|
The court affirmed in part and dismissed and vacated in part the decision of a federal district court holding that asserted claims of Exelixis Inc.'s malate salt patents aren’t invalid, in this infringement action against MSN Laboratories Private Limited. Exelixis Inc. v. MSN Labs. Priv. Ltd., 2026 BL 337648, Fed. Cir., 2025-1236, 8/31/26 Read More
|
|
|
The PTAB said that challenged claims of Feit Electric Company Inc.'s patent that relates to light-emitting diode devices that use photoluminescent materials are unpatentable, in inter partes reviews by Savant Technologies LLC and LEDVANCE LLC. Savant Technologies LLC v. Feit Electric Company Inc., P.T.A.B., IPR 2024-01357, IPR 2025-00260 , 8/31/26 Read More
|
|
|
The PTAB said that challenged claims of Manufacturing Resources International Inc.'s patent that relates to an electronic display including an electronic image assembly and a cooling system for electronic displays are unpatentable, in an inter partes review by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Manufacturing Resources International Inc., P.T.A.B., IPR 2023-00254 , 8/31/26 Read More
|
|
|
|
|
|